Garcia v. Toezpecunia, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided May 30, 2024·No. 6:22-cv-00639·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

HEYLI WOODRUFF,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:22-cv-639-MK

v. ORDER

TOEZPECUNIA, INC.,

Defendants. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation, (ECF No. 64), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Defendants filed objections. ECF No. 66. Accordingly, the Court reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error and concludes the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 64) is ADOPTED. Defendants’ Motion for Summary 1 –ORDER Judgment (ECF No. 34) is DENIED. Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 36, 57) are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 30th day of May, 2024. s/ Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge

2 –ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. Toezpecunia, Inc., (D. Or. 2024).

Garcia v. Toezpecunia, Inc. (Garcia v. Toezpecunia, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related