Garcia v. State
217 S.W. 943, 86 Tex. Crim. 471
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 Tex. Crim. 9 →
Opinion
Prom a conviction for robbery appellant has prosecuted his appeal.
There was no statement of facts or bill of exceptions filed in the court below, as noted in the record, and the motion for a new trial only complains that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence. Without the testimony these matters cannot be revised.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. State, 217 S.W. 943, 86 Tex. Crim. 471 (Tex. 1920).
217 S.W. 943 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.