Garcia v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Garcia v. State

148 S.W. 1198, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 732

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 Tex. Crim. 485 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 28, 1912·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of perjury; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment, we think, is sufficient to charge the offense of perjury. There being no error alleged that can be reviewed in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

Appellant was convicted of perjury; his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment, we think, is sufficient to charge the offense of perjury. There being no error alleged that can be reviewed in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts, the judgment is affirmed.

Garcia v. State, 148 S.W. 1198, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 732 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

148 S.W. 1198 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.