Garcia v. State

151 So. 3d 1274, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19626, 2014 WL 6790040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7836
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 2014·No. 2D13-6251·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Sonny Garcia appeals the revocation of his sex offender probation for the offense of possession of child pornography and his resulting sentence of forty-eight months in prison. We affirm the revocation of his probation because there was competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that Garcia “intentionally] disregarded] ... the GPS monitoring rules,” constituting a willful and substantial violation of probation. Correa v. State, 43 So.3d 738, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (noting that “noncompliance with the rules [that] results from equipment problems or the subject’s unintentional failure to operate the equipment properly ... does not rise to the level of a willful and substantial violation of probation” but that “intentional disregard of the GPS monitoring rules, tampering with the equipment, or actual violations of curfew or other activity re *1275 strictions will generally amount to willful and substantial violations”); see also State v. Carter, 835 So.2d 259, 262 (Fla.2002) (“The trial court is in a better position to identify the probation violator’s motive, intent, and attitude and assess whether the violation is both willful and substantial.”).

Affirmed.

DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 151 So. 3d 1274, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19626, 2014 WL 6790040 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

151 So. 3d 1274 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Carter
835 So. 2d 259 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Correa v. State
43 So. 3d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)