Garcia v. State

148 So. 3d 848, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16941, 2014 WL 5285003
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 17, 2014·No. No. 5D13-3613·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this Anders1 appeal but remand to correct two scrivener’s errors in the judgment. First, the judgment should reflect, consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement, that Garcia was sentenced as a prison releasee reoffender only as to Count I. Second, the judgment incorrectly indicates that Garcia entered a no contest plea when, in fact, he was convicted after a jury trial.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 148 So. 3d 848, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16941, 2014 WL 5285003 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

148 So. 3d 848 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamblin v. State
159 So. 3d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Skinner v. State
155 So. 3d 497 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)