Garcia v. State

652 So. 2d 987, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 1995 WL 170377
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 614 So. 2d 568
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1995·No. No. 94-497·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction for three counts of armed kidnapping, two counts of armed robbery, armed burglary and aggravated assault on two grounds.

We find no merit to appellant’s first point on appeal. As to the remaining ground, we agree that the unsolicited testimony by a police officer that a non-testifying codefendant had identified the defendant as being involved in the criminal episodes was error, but we find that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the other over[988]*988whelming evidence of guilt introduced at the trial. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 652 So. 2d 987, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3658, 1995 WL 170377 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

652 So. 2d 987 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)