Garcia v. State

512 So. 2d 310, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2225, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10203
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1799
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1987·No. No. 86-1261·Published

Opinion

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

Defendant Maximo Garcia appeals his conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine and conspiracy to traffic in cocaine.

[311]*311Garcia, along with Pablo Abreu, was arrested on September 30, 1985, during an alleged drug transaction arranged by a police informant. The facts of the case are not in dispute and are set out in detail in Abreu v. State, 511 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

As in Abreu, we find that the prosecutor improperly commented on the defendant’s right not to testify. For the reasons outlined in Abreu and based on the authorities cited therein, we find that the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss was harmful error. Furthermore, as in Abreu, we find it unnecessary to reach the defendant’s remaining arguments.

Accordingly, we vacate the defendant’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State, 512 So. 2d 310, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2225, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10203 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

512 So. 2d 310 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abreu v. State
511 So. 2d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)