Garcia v. State
445 So. 2d 643, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11812
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 454 So. 2d 714 →
Opinion
It is unnecessary to address appellant’s main point on appeal which challenges the ruling that his confession was voluntarily and freely given. Even were we to hold the confession inadmissible, the remaining competent evidence was more than ample to “satisfy the conscience of the court” that the conditions of probation had been substantively violated. See Randolph v. State, 292 So.2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 300 So.2d 901 (Fla.1974); McNeely v. State, 186 So.2d 520 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. State, 445 So. 2d 643, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
445 So. 2d 643 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Randolph v. State
292 So. 2d 374 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
McNeely v. State
186 So. 2d 520 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)