Garcia v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garcia v. State

302 So. 2d 472

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 29, 1974

DocketNo. 73-985

StatusPublished

This text of 302 So. 2d 472 (Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garcia v. State, 302 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of rape. The court sentenced him to life imprisonment. He has filed three motions for post-conviction relief. See Garcia v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 300. This appeal is from the denial of the third motion.

After the denial by this court of the public defender’s motion to withdraw, the record has been fully examined in the light of appellant’s allegations and the briefs submitted. We hold that the trial court properly denied the motion for post-judgment relief. See Swindle v. State, Fla. App. 1967, 202 So.2d 132.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of rape. The court sentenced him to life imprisonment. He has filed three motions for post-conviction relief. See Garcia v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 300. This appeal is from the denial of the third motion.

After the denial by this court of the public defender’s motion to withdraw, the record has been fully examined in the light of appellant’s allegations and the briefs submitted. We hold that the trial court properly denied the motion for post-judgment relief. See Swindle v. State, Fla. App. 1967, 202 So.2d 132.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 So. 2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack