Garcia v. State Farm Insurance

232 A.D.2d 488, 648 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10159
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1996·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to compel arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, State Farm Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated August 21, 1995, which granted the petitioner’s application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the application is denied.

[489] As a condition precedent to payment of underinsurance, "the limits of liability of all bodily injury liability bonds or insurance policies applicable at the time of the accident shall be exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements” (Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]). Here, the petitioner failed to establish that she exhausted all insurance policies covering the offending vehicle. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the application to compel arbitration. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. State Farm Insurance, 232 A.D.2d 488, 648 N.Y.S.2d 340, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 488 (Garcia v. State Farm Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wirth v. Domerson
S.D. New York, 2023
Ducz v. Progressive Northeastern Insurance
113 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)