Garcia v. Shinseki

416 F. App'x 901
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2011
DocketNo. 2011-7023
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 416 F. App'x 901 (Garcia v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Shinseki, 416 F. App'x 901 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Avelardo Garcia responds to the court’s order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely-

The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in this case on July 29, 2010. The court received Garcia’s notice of appeal on October 15, 2010, or 78 days after entry of judgment.

An appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must be received within 60 days of the date of entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). This filing period is statutory, mandatory, and jurisdictional. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007). Garcia’s appeal was not received by the court within the statutory period. Thus, we must dismiss his appeal.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alford v. Del Toro
E.D. North Carolina, 2022
Alford v. United States
127 Fed. Cl. 345 (Federal Claims, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F. App'x 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-shinseki-cafc-2011.