Garcia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-816V
LINDA GARCIA, Chief Special Master Corcoran
Petitioner, Filed: May 2, 2025 v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
Michael A. Baseluos, Baseluos Law Firm, PLLC, San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner.
Meghan Murphy, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
On January 28, 2021, Linda Garcia filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) after receiving an influenza vaccination on October 26, 2020. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On January 28, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On April 30, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $138,615.70, representing $135,000.00 for actual pain and suffering and $3,615.70 for past unreimbursable expenses. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that
1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made
publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).
Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $138,615.70, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
)
LINDA GARCIA, )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 21-816V v. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On January 28, 2021, Linda Garcia (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation
(“Petition”) under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -
34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), as amended, alleging that she suffered from a right shoulder injury
related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination she
received on October 26, 2020. Petition at 1. On May 12, 2023, respondent filed his Rule 4(c)
Report asserting that this case was not appropriate for compensation. ECF No. 59. After the
parties briefed entitlement, Chief Special Master Corcoran issued a Ruling on Entitlement
finding petitioner entitled to compensation on January 8, 2025. ECF No. 64.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $135,000.00 in pain and suffering.
See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that she incurred past unreimbursable
expenses related to her vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $3,615.70. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.
These amounts represent all elements of compensation to which petitioner is entitled
under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a
lump sum payment as described below and requests that Chief Special Master Corcoran’s
decision and the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump sum payment of $138,615.70, to
be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt
disbursement to petitioner.
Respectfully submitted,
YAAKOV M. ROTH Acting Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future, unreimbursed expenses, future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
JULIA M. COLLISON Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Meghan R. Murphy MEGHAN R. MURPHY Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 616-4264 meghan.r.murphy@usdoj.gov
DATED: April 30, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Garcia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.