Garcia v. Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church

2024 NY Slip Op 03134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 2024
DocketIndex No. 26676/18 Appeal No. 2464 Case No. 2024-01405
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 03134 (Garcia v. Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church, 2024 NY Slip Op 03134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Garcia v Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church (2024 NY Slip Op 03134)
Garcia v Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church
2024 NY Slip Op 03134
Decided on June 11, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 11, 2024
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Singh, Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Index No. 26676/18 Appeal No. 2464 Case No. 2024-01405

[*1]Brunilda Garcia, Appellant,

v

Saint Spyridon Greek Orthodox Church et al., Respondents.


Budin, Reisman, Kupferberg & Bernstein, LLP, New York (Gregory C. McMahon of counsel), for appellant.

Fleischner Potash, LLP, Mineola (Evan A. Richman of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 11, 2023, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence showing that the sidewalk defect that caused plaintiff to trip and fall had a slight height differential of one-quarter of an inch, which constituted a trivial defect as a matter of law. The minor height differentiation is insufficient to establish the existence of a dangerous or defective condition for which defendants could be liable (see Martin v Lafayette Morrison Hous. Corp., 31 AD3d 300, 301 [1st Dept 2006]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to submit evidence to raise an issue of fact as to whether the defect was not trivial in nature.

We have considered and rejected plaintiff's remaining arguments.

 THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 11, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Lafayette Morrison Housing Corp.
31 A.D.3d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 03134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-saint-spyridon-greek-orthodox-church-nyappdiv-2024.