Garcia v. Nutmeg Mills

722 So. 2d 208, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10785, 1998 WL 530018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 25, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2167
StatusPublished

This text of 722 So. 2d 208 (Garcia v. Nutmeg Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Nutmeg Mills, 722 So. 2d 208, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10785, 1998 WL 530018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims erred in reversing her prior finding of causation relating to claimant’s psychiatric condition without a proper motion and hearing as required by section 440.28, Florida Statutes. The error nevertheless is harmless. Competent, substantial evidence supports her later conclusions that claimant is not permanently and totally disabled as a result of the industrial accident, that he has reached psychological maximum medical improvement without any permanent impairment, and that he is not entitled to wage loss benefits for the period claimed.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 So. 2d 208, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10785, 1998 WL 530018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-nutmeg-mills-fladistctapp-1998.