Garcia v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

230 A.D.2d 766, 646 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8361
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 12, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 230 A.D.2d 766 (Garcia v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 230 A.D.2d 766, 646 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered February 23, 1995, as, upon a jury verdict awarding $200,000 for conscious pain and suffering, $1,200,000 for wrongful death, $1,000,000 for loss of maternal care for the decedent’s son, and $1,500,000 for loss of maternal care for the decedent’s daughter, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in the principal sum of $3,900,000.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the facts and as a [767]*767matter of discretion, by deleting the provisions thereof which awarded damages for wrongful death and loss of maternal care to the decedent’s son and daughter and substituting therefor a provision severing the plaintiffs’ causes of action as to those damages and granting a new trial with respect thereto; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellants, unless within 30 days after service upon them a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, the plaintiffs shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for wrongful death from the sum $1,200,000 to the sum $800,000 ($328,000 for past damages and $472,000 for future damages), for loss of maternal care and guidance to the son from the sum of $1,000,000 to the sum of $750,000, and for loss of maternal care and guidance to the daughter from the sum of $1,500,000 to the sum of $850,000, and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment in their favor; in the event that the plaintiffs so stipulate then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment accordingly.

In March 1984, Gloria Garcia, a 42-year-old homemaker, was admitted as a patient at Coney Island Hospital for exploratory surgery and a total abdominal hysterectomy. As part of the preoperative procedure, Dr. Rahmo Hanono, the anesthesiologist, administered medication (pentothal, innovar, valium, and succinycholine) to paralyze all the muscles within Garcia’s body except her heart. As a result of the medication, Garcia was unable to spontaneously breathe and Dr. Hanono therefore needed to intubate and connect Garcia to a respirator.

On the day prior to the operation, Dr. Hanono had been approached by a third-year medical student, known only by the name "George”, who asked if he could perform the intubation under the doctor’s supervision. Under Dr. Hanono’s supervision "George” inserted an endotracheal tube into Garcia’s throat. However, the endotracheal tube was not placed in the trachea, but rather was lodged in Garcia’s esophagus.

Within minutes of intubating Garcia, she suffered "bradycardia” whereby her pulse rate slowed to approximately 35 beats per minute. In less than a minute, Garcia also began to experience hypotension (low blood pressure). Dr. Hanono then removed the endotracheal tube, but Garcia went into cardiac arrest. By the time Garcia was stabilized she had suffered brain

[768]*768damage and was in a coma. Garcia thereafter languished in a comatose state over the next several days until she was declared brain dead and died.

Under these facts we find that the award for conscious pain and suffering was proper. However, the pecuniary damage awards for wrongful death and loss of parental care and guidance to the decedent’s children deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, Glassman v City of New York, 225 AD2d 658; Facilla v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 221 AD2d 498; Plotkin v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 221 AD2d 425).

We find no merit to the appellants’ remaining contention.

Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wasserberg v. Menorah Ctr. for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care
2021 NY Slip Op 04923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
In re the Complaint of Moran Towing Corp.
984 F. Supp. 2d 150 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Twersky v. Busche
37 A.D.3d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Adderley v. City of New York
304 A.D.2d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
McAndrews v. City of New York
299 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.
96 F. Supp. 2d 352 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Moldawsky v. Simmons Airlines, Inc.
14 F. Supp. 2d 533 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Bryant v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
250 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Bert v. Meyer
243 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D.2d 766, 646 N.Y.S.2d 694, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1996.