Garcia v. Long Island MTA

2 A.D.3d 675, 768 N.Y.S.2d 630
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Long Island MTA and William Brown appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated January 13, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The conflicting medical reports of the parties’ respective experts raised triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiffs sustained serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Kraemer v Henning, 237 AD2d 492 [1997]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. Long Island MTA, 2 A.D.3d 675, 768 N.Y.S.2d 630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 675 (Garcia v. Long Island MTA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reid v. Spice City, Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 04667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Saez v. Lyka Taxi Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 31900(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)