Garcia v. Long Island Lighting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garcia v. Long Island Lighting Co.

129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45364

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.2d 677 (Garcia v. Long Island Lighting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garcia v. Long Island Lighting Co., 129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 14, 1986, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ [678]*678motion which were to compel it to respond to discovery demands numbered 17, 18 and 19.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Wager at the Supreme Court, Nassau County; the defendant’s time to respond to the discovery demands in question is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 14, 1986, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ [678]*678motion which were to compel it to respond to discovery demands numbered 17, 18 and 19.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Wager at the Supreme Court, Nassau County; the defendant’s time to respond to the discovery demands in question is extended until 20 days after service upon it of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Kunzeman and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.2d 677, 514 N.Y.S.2d 643, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-long-island-lighting-co-nyappdiv-1987.