Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.

Opinion

1 Ernest H. Eubanks, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 2 seubanks@rumberger.com Florida Bar No. 0612091 3 Steven I. Klein (Pro Hac Vice) 4 sklein@rumberger.com Florida Bar. No. 0675245 5 Samantha C. Duke (Pro Hac Vice) 6 sduke@rumberger.com Florida Bar No. 091403 7 RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL, P.A. 8 300 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1400 Orlando, Florida 32801 9 Telephone: (407) 872-7300 Facsimile: (407) 841-2133

Abirami Gnanadesigan SBN 263375 AGnanadesigan@dykema.com DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 457-1800 Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 John M. Thomas SBN 266842 JThomas@dykema.com Krista L. Lenart klenart@dykema.com 2723 South State Street, Suite 400 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 Telephone: (734) 214-7660 Facsimile: (734) 214-7696

Attorneys for Defendant,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 1 1

2 RONALD GARCIA and MICHAEL Case No. 3:19-cv-02054 JCS 3 HARRISON, Class Action

4 Plaintiffs, JOINT STIPULATION FOR 5 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. 6 7 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR Complaint Filed: April 16, 2019 COMPANY GROUP, LLC, Trial Date: None Set 8 Judge: Magistrate Joseph C. Spero 9 Defendant. Date: June 28, 2019 Ctrm: G, 15th Floor

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiffs, Ronald Garcia and Michael Harrison and Defendant, Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC, by and through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this stipulation is effective immediately and no court order is required. Urista v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00429-, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155104, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021) (“Case law concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.”); see also Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is effective on filing) Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 20, 2021 /s/ Nicholas W. Armstrong Nicholas W. Armstrong Attorney for Plaintiffs 2 /s/ Steven I. Klein Steven I. Klein Attorney for Defendant "5 DISTRIC i> xD iS > TTS 80 one Dated: September 21, 2021 ° csv YZ CA judge Joven ©

Yy DISTRICS Lianan ATR 9.10 acer WINKA

2 I, Steven I. Klein, am the CM/ECF user whose ID and password are being used to 3 4 file this Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Pursuant to the Local Civil Rules, 5 I hereby attest that Nicholas W. Armstrong, on whose behalf this filing is jointly 6 submitted, has concurred in this filing. 7 8 /s/ Steven I. Klein

9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (United States District Court)

I hereby certify that on September 20, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing document described as JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notifications of such filing via electronic mail to all counsel of record.

By: /s/ Steven I. Klein