Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided September 21, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-02054·Unknown

Opinion

1 Ernest H. Eubanks, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) 2 seubanks@rumberger.com Florida Bar No. 0612091 3 Steven I. Klein (Pro Hac Vice) 4 sklein@rumberger.com Florida Bar. No. 0675245 5 Samantha C. Duke (Pro Hac Vice) 6 sduke@rumberger.com Florida Bar No. 091403 7 RUMBERGER, KIRK & CALDWELL, P.A. 8 300 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1400 Orlando, Florida 32801 9 Telephone: (407) 872-7300 10 Facsimile: (407) 841-2133

11 Abirami Gnanadesigan SBN 263375 12 AGnanadesigan@dykema.com DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 13 333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2100 14 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 457-1800 15 Facsimile: (213) 457-1850 16 John M. Thomas SBN 266842 17 JThomas@dykema.com 18 Krista L. Lenart klenart@dykema.com 20 2723 South State Street, Suite 400 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 21 Telephone: (734) 214-7660 22 Facsimile: (734) 214-7696

23 Attorneys for Defendant,

25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 26 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 27 28 1 1

2 RONALD GARCIA and MICHAEL Case No. 3:19-cv-02054 JCS 3 HARRISON, Class Action

4 Plaintiffs, JOINT STIPULATION FOR 5 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE vs. 6 7 HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR Complaint Filed: April 16, 2019 COMPANY GROUP, LLC, Trial Date: None Set 8 Judge: Magistrate Joseph C. Spero 9 Defendant. Date: June 28, 2019 Ctrm: G, 15th Floor 10

12 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiffs, Ronald Garcia and Michael 13 Harrison and Defendant, Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC, by and through 14 the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 15 Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this stipulation is effective immediately and no 16 court order is required. Urista v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 1:21-cv-00429-, 2021 U.S. 17 Dist. LEXIS 155104, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021) (“Case law concerning stipulated 18 dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is clear that the entry of such a stipulation of 19 dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval.”); see also 20 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 21 (dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is effective on filing) 22 23 Respectfully submitted, 24 25 Dated: September 20, 2021 /s/ Nicholas W. Armstrong Nicholas W. Armstrong 26 Attorney for Plaintiffs 27 28 2 1 /s/ Steven I. Klein 2 Steven I. Klein 3 Attorney for Defendant 4 "5 DISTRIC 5 i> xD iS 6 > TTS 80 one 7 | Dated: September 21, 2021 ° csv YZ CA judge Joven ©

Yy DISTRICS 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lianan ATR 9.10 acer WINKA

2 I, Steven I. Klein, am the CM/ECF user whose ID and password are being used to 3 4 file this Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. Pursuant to the Local Civil Rules, 5 I hereby attest that Nicholas W. Armstrong, on whose behalf this filing is jointly 6 submitted, has concurred in this filing. 7 8 /s/ Steven I. Klein

9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 10 (United States District Court)

11 I hereby certify that on September 20, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing 12 document described as JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 13 14 with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notifications of 15 such filing via electronic mail to all counsel of record. 16

17 By: /s/ Steven I. Klein 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc., (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. (Garcia v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.