Garcia v. Goord

261 A.D.2d 674, 690 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 6, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 674 (Garcia v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 674, 690 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of engaging in a sexual act and violating visiting room procedures. According to the misbehavior report, two correction officers witnessed petitioner’s visitor fondling his groin and then place his penis back in his pants after one of the correction officers motioned petitioner to come over to the officer’s station. Petitioner’s administrative appeal of the determination of guilt was unsuccessful, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. In our view, the misbehavior report, combined with the eyewitness testimony of the author of the misbehavior report, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966). Although petitioner offered an innocent explanation for the incident, this merely raised a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of De La Rosa v Portuondo, 247 AD2d 810, 811). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been examined and, to the extent that they have been preserved for appellate review, found to be without merit.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Lopez v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 2766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Quinones v. Fischer
55 A.D.3d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
West v. McGinnis
4 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Morales v. Goord
290 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Mealer v. Selsky
290 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Marcelin v. Selsky
289 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Johnson v. Selsky
271 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Garnette v. Goord
270 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 674, 690 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-goord-nyappdiv-1999.