Garcia v. Garrett
Opinion
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4
5 RAUL GARCIA, Case No. 3:22-cv-00332-ART-CSD
6 Petitioner, ORDER v. 7 TIM GARRETT, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 In this habeas corpus action, the Court appointed counsel for Petitioner, 11 Raul Garcia. (ECF No. 3.) The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada 12 appeared on Garcia’s behalf on September 27, 2022. (ECF No. 6.) Respondents 13 have also appeared. (ECF No. 5.) 14 It is therefore ordered that the following will govern further proceedings in 15 this action: 16 The Federal Public Defender, through Jonathan M. Kirshbaum, is 17 appointed as counsel for the Petitioner Raul Garcia under 18 U.SC. § 18 3006A(a)(2)(B). Counsel will represent Garcia in all federal proceedings related 19 to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to 20 withdraw. 21 If necessary, Garcia must file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus 22 within 120 days after entry of this Order. The amended petition must specifically 23 state whether each ground for relief has been exhausted in state court. For each 24 claim that has been exhausted in state court, the amended petition must state 25 how, when, and where, the claim was exhausted. If Garcia determines an 26 amended petition need not be filed, then, within 120 days after entry of this 27 Order, Garcia must file a notice to that effect. 28 Respondents will have 60 days following the filing of the amended petition 1 to file an answer or other response to the amended petition. If Garcia does not 2 file an amended petition, Respondents will have 60 days following the due date 3 for the amended petition to file an answer or other response to the original 4 petition. In any answer filed on the merits, Respondents shall specifically cite to 5 and address the applicable state court written decision and state court record 6 materials, if any, regarding each claim within the response to that claim. 7 Garcia will have 45 days following the filing of an answer to file a reply. 8 Respondents will thereafter have 30 days following the filing of a reply to file a 9 response to the reply. 10 If Respondents file a motion to dismiss, Garcia will have 60 days following 11 the filing of the motion to dismiss to file a response to that motion. Respondents 12 will thereafter have 30 days following the filing of the response to file a reply. 13 If Garcia wishes to move for leave to conduct discovery, Garcia must file 14 such motion concurrently with, but separate from, the response to Respondents’ 15 motion to dismiss or the reply to Respondents’ answer. Any motion for leave to 16 conduct discovery filed by Garcia before that time may be considered premature, 17 and may be denied, without prejudice, on that basis. Respondents must file a 18 response to any such motion concurrently with, but separate from, their reply in 19 support of their motion to dismiss or their response to Garcia’s reply. Thereafter, 20 Garcia will have 20 days to file a reply in support of the motion for leave to 21 conduct discovery. 22 If Garcia wishes to request an evidentiary hearing, Garcia must file a 23 motion for an evidentiary hearing concurrently with, but separate from, the 24 response to Respondents’ motion to dismiss or the reply to Respondents’ answer. 25 Any motion for an evidentiary hearing filed by Garcia before that time may be 26 considered premature, and may be denied, without prejudice, on that basis. The 27 motion for an evidentiary hearing must specifically address why an evidentiary 28 hearing is required and must meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e). The 1 motion must state whether an evidentiary hearing was held in state court, and, 2 if so, state where the transcript is located in the record. If Garcia files a motion 3 for an evidentiary hearing, Respondents must file a response to that motion 4 concurrently with, but separate from, their reply in support of their motion to 5 dismiss or their response to Garcia’s reply. Thereafter, Garcia will have 20 days 6 to file a reply in support of the motion for an evidentiary hearing. 7 All procedural defenses raised by Respondents, including exhaustion, must 8 be raised in a single consolidated motion to dismiss. The Court does not wish to 9 address any procedural defenses in seriatim fashion in multiple successive 10 motions to dismiss. Procedural defenses omitted from such motion to dismiss will 11 be subject to potential waiver. Respondents shall not file a response that 12 consolidates their procedural defenses, if any, with their responses on the merits, 13 except under 28 U.S.C § 2254(b)(2) as to any unexhausted claims clearly lacking 14 merit. If Respondents seek dismissal of unexhausted claims under § 2254(b)(2) 15 they must: (a) do so within the single motion to dismiss and not in the answer; 16 and (b) specifically direct their argument to the standard for dismissal under § 17 2254(b)(2) set forth in Cassett v. Stewart, 406 F.3d 614, 623–24 (9th Cir. 2005). 18 The parties must redact personal-data identifiers in all documents filed 19 with the Court as required by LR IC 6. Any state court record and related exhibits 20 must be filed in accordance with LR IA 10-3 and LR IC 2-2 and be filed with a 21 separate index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number. The index must be 22 filed in CM/ECF’s document upload screen as the base document to receive the 23 base docket number (e.g., ECF No. 10). Each exhibit must then be filed as 24 “attachments” to the base document—i.e., the index—to receive a sequenced sub- 25 docket number (e.g., Exhibit A (ECF No. 10-1), Exhibit B (ECF No. 10-2), Exhibit 26 C (ECF No. 10-3), and so forth). If the exhibits will span more than one filing, the 27 base document in each successive filing must be either a copy of the index or 28 volume cover page. See LR IC 2-2(a)(3)(A). Paper copies of any exhibits over 50 1 || pages—for this case—must be appropriately bound, tabbed, and delivered to the 2 || Reno Clerk’s office. See LR JIA 10-3(i); LR IC 2-2(g). Courtesy copies must be 3 || addressed to the attention of “Staff Attorney” on the mailing address label. 4 DATED THIS 12th day of October 2022. 5 en Apex Howat
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. Garrett (Garcia v. Garrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.