Garcia v. Dormitory Authority

195 A.D.2d 288, 599 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6843
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 195 A.D.2d 288 (Garcia v. Dormitory Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Dormitory Authority, 195 A.D.2d 288, 599 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered May 27, 1992, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant provided financing to Columbia University, plaintiff’s employer, for the construction of dormitory facilities under an agreement which provides that title will be held by defendant until the loan is repaid. Thus, the relationship between the parties can be said to be more akin to that of mortgagor and mortgagee rather than that of traditional owner and tenant.

A statutory responsibility is imposed on an owner "for the ^>fe maintenance of the building and its facilities” pursuant [289]*289to Building Code (Administrative Code of City of NY) § 27-128 (Multiple Dwelling Law § 78). However, the owner which has completely parted with possession and control of a building will not be held liable unless it retains a right to enter to make inspection and repairs (Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559, 566). The rights reserved to defendant Authority do not constitute sufficient retention of control to subject the Authority to liability for failure to maintain the premises in good repair (supra). The lease is not a standard leasing agreement, but rather a part of an extensive financing arrangement (see, Green v Dormitory Auth., 173 AD2d 1, 5, lv denied 79 NY2d 756). Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dass v. Dormitory Auth. of the State of N.Y.
221 A.D.3d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Evans v. State
55 Misc. 3d 221 (New York State Court of Claims, 2016)
Michalczuk v. Resort Realty Associates Partnership
131 A.D.3d 457 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Dempaire v. City of New York
61 A.D.3d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Morris v. City of New York
21 Misc. 3d 758 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Drucker v. Mauro
30 A.D.3d 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pekelnaya v. Allyn
25 A.D.3d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Worthy v. New York City Housing Authority
21 A.D.3d 284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Bonifacio v. 910-930 Southern Boulevard LLC
295 A.D.2d 86 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Shrenkel v. New York State Dormitory Authority
266 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Miele v. UDC-Ten Eyck Development Corp.
235 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 288, 599 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-dormitory-authority-nyappdiv-1993.