Garcia v. Collazo

758 So. 2d 721, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4299, 2000 WL 368649
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2000·No. No. 3D99-565·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order granting the defendant landlord final summary judgment. “The open and obvious nature of the hazard does not provide an avenue of relief. ...” Jauma v. City of Hialeah, 758 So.2d 696, 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). “[Although the open and obvious nature of a hazard may discharge a landowner’s duty to warn, it does not discharge the duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition.” Kersul v. Boca Raton Community Hosp., Inc., 711 So.2d 234, 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp., 702 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. Collazo, 758 So. 2d 721, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4299, 2000 WL 368649 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

758 So. 2d 721 (Garcia v. Collazo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aaron v. Palatka Mall, LLC
908 So. 2d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)