Garcia v. City of New York

290 A.D.2d 379, 736 N.Y.S.2d 592, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcia v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 A.D.3d 725

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2001, which, in an action by a laborer against a building owner for personal injuries and a third-party action by the building owner against a contractor in which issue was not joined until after plaintiff had been granted partial summary judgment on the issue of the building owner’s liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), insofar as appealed from, denied the contractor’s motion to sever the third-party action from the main action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The order on appeal makes specific provision for completion of disclosure in the third-party action, and the contractor does not show a need for disclosure that cannot be met under the order, or other prejudice warranting severance of a third-party action for indemnity or contribution that, if possible, clearly should be tried with the main action (see, Vitiello v Mayrich Constr. Corp., 255 AD2d 182, 184-185; Erbach Fin. Corp. v Royal Bank, 203 AD2d 80). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. City of New York, 290 A.D.2d 379, 736 N.Y.S.2d 592, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

290 A.D.2d 379 (Garcia v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erbach Finance Corp. v. Royal Bank of Canada
203 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Vitiello v. Mayrich Construction Corp.
255 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)