Garcia v. City of New York

475 N.E.2d 123, 64 N.Y.2d 735, 485 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4902
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 1984·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal, etc., dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to respondent City, upon the ground that the prior order of the Appellate Division sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; however, if that prior order “necessarily affects” the final determination, it may be reviewed upon plaintiff’s pending appeal taken as of right from the final order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5501, subd [a], par 1; see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia v. City of New York, 475 N.E.2d 123, 64 N.Y.2d 735, 485 N.Y.S.2d 752, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4902 (N.Y. 1984).

475 N.E.2d 123 (Garcia v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)