Garcia v. Cape Hampton, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garcia v. Cape Hampton, LLC

19 A.D.3d 543, 796 N.Y.S.2d 529

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 543 (Garcia v. Cape Hampton, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garcia v. Cape Hampton, LLC, 19 A.D.3d 543, 796 N.Y.S.2d 529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the proposed intervenor, Emptage & Associates, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fitts, J), dated October 28, 2003, as denied the motion of the defendant Cape Hampton, LLC, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CFLR 5511). Its motion to intervene and to join in the motion by Cape Hampton, LLC, was not considered by the Supreme Court and therefore is not before this Court. Schmidt, J.E, Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the proposed intervenor, Emptage & Associates, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fitts, J), dated October 28, 2003, as denied the motion of the defendant Cape Hampton, LLC, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CFLR 5511). Its motion to intervene and to join in the motion by Cape Hampton, LLC, was not considered by the Supreme Court and therefore is not before this Court. Schmidt, J.E, Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 543, 796 N.Y.S.2d 529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-cape-hampton-llc-nyappdiv-2005.