Garcia v. Brooks

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 18, 2005
• Docket: 04-7642
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7642

ESTEBAN GARCIA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN BROOKS, Medical Administrator; MS MENDOZA, FCI Petersburg; DOCTOR ALLEN, FCI Petersburg,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-133-2)

Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: March 18, 2005

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Esteban Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Esteban Garcia appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Garcia v. Brooks, No. CA-04-133-

2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2004). We deny Garcia’s motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -