Garcia v. Boxer Prop. Mgmt. Corp.

781 S.E.2d 532
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 2016
DocketNo. COA15–803.
StatusPublished

This text of 781 S.E.2d 532 (Garcia v. Boxer Prop. Mgmt. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Boxer Prop. Mgmt. Corp., 781 S.E.2d 532 (N.C. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Case Reported Without Published Opinion

Dismissed.

1 The deposition of Plaintiff Carlos Garcia lists his name as "Carlos Garcia Pairazaman," but the complaint, order appealed from, and other documents in the record on appeal list his name as "Carlos Garcia." Further, the fifth named plaintiff is referred to as "Carlos Ramirez Garcia" in the transcript of his deposition, but is listed as "Carlos Rodriguez Garcia" in the complaint, order appealed from, and other documents in the record on appeal.

2 The record on appeal reveals that named defendants Capco 1998-D7 Central Avenue Mall, LLC, Lynn Parker, and LNR Partners, Inc ., were never served with a summons and complaint and, accordingly, were never parties to this action. Further, only Plaintiffs Carlos Garcia and Sayda Martinez filed a notice of appeal in this matter. Per the custom of this Court, however, we list the parties exactly as they appear in the caption of the order from which the appeal is taken

--------

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 S.E.2d 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-boxer-prop-mgmt-corp-ncctapp-2016.