Garcia v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedNovember 25, 2019
Docket1:19-cv-08297-SDA
StatusUnknown

This text of Garcia v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp. (Garcia v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Opinion

Oscar E. Sanchez, Esq. MEMO ENDORSED ATTORNY AT LAW SANCHEZ & ASSOCIATES

November 23, 2019

This motion is STAYED pending resolution of the VIA ECF same motion in the related case Lopez v. 3662 Honorable Edgardo Ramos Broadway Restaurant Corp., 19 Civ. 975, Doc. 24. United States District Court gE () > for the Southern District of New York yt 40 Foley Square Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J New York, NY 10007 Dated: Nov. 25,2019 New York, New York Re: — Alfredo Garcia, et al v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp. et al 19 Civ. 08297 (ER) Dear Judge Ramos: We represent defendants 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp. (d/b/a Taqueria San Pedro) and Albertico Chavez in the above-reference matter, and are writing to respectfully request that the Court issue an order for an automatic stay for the aforementioned action. On November 20, 2019, defendant Albertico Chavez filed a voluntary petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York for relief under chapter 13 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the case In re Albertico Chavez, Case No. 19-13736-cgm. Attached is Doc. No. 23 - Suggestion of Bankruptcy of Defendant and Notice of Bankruptcy Case Filing. The corporate defendant 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp. is wholely-owned by Mr. Chavez. It is the corporate defendant’s position the stay also applies to this defendant because it is wholly owned by Mr. Chavez, and an adjudication of a claim against this corporation will have an immediate adverse economic impact on Mr. Chavez’s bankruptcy estate. Queenie, Ltd. v. Nygard, 321 F.3d 283 (2d Cir. 2003). In Queenie, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals applied the automatic stay imposed by an individual’s chapter 11 filing to a non-debtor corporation wholly owned by the individual, Gardner, on the basis that “adjudication of a claim against the corporation will have an immediate adverse economic impact on Gardner.” Jd. at 288. The action at issue in Queenie was the appeal by Gardner and his wholly-owned corporation, Queenie, Ltd., of an adverse judgment against them. However, district courts have reached different conclusions when the individual debtor files bankruptcy under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. As the district court stated in M.E.S., Inc. v. M.J. Favorito Electronic, Inc., U.S. Eastern District of New York, Case. No.: 08-CV-183 (JG) (JIMA) (decided on March 15, 2010): One bankruptcy court has stated that the automatic stay resulting from a Chapter 13 petition, as opposed to a Chapter 11 or Chapter 7 petition, cannot extend to an LLC co-defendant owned by the petitioner. In re McCormick, 381 B.R. 594, 601-

40-20 58th Street Office: (718) 489-9600 Woodside, NY 11377 Fax: (347) 549-4106

SANCHEZ & ASSOCIATES

02 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008). I respectfully disagree. I see no basis for interpreting § 362(a)(1) differently depending on the form of bankruptcy protection the debtor has applied for, or for limiting Queenie’s reach to corporations, as opposed to LLCs. M.E.S., Inc., on Page 5, Footnote 3. We have attached M.E.S., Inc. and In re McCormick to this letter motion. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Respectfully, s/Oscar E. Sanchez Oscar E. Sanchez Enclosures cc: John M. Gurrieri, Esq. (via ECF) Law Office of Justin A. Zeller, P.C. 277 Broadway, Ste. 408 New York, NY 10007-2036

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re McCormick
381 B.R. 594 (S.D. New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garcia v. 3662 Broadway Restaurant Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-3662-broadway-restaurant-corp-nysd-2019.