Garcia v. 12th & 13th Webster Street, LLC
This text of Garcia v. 12th & 13th Webster Street, LLC (Garcia v. 12th & 13th Webster Street, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORLANDO GARCIA, Case No. 21-cv-03549-AGT Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING Vv. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 12TH & 13TH WEBSTER STREET, LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 30 Defendant. Plaintiff's evidence isn’t uncontroverted but at this stage it does “establish a prima facie case of jurisdiction.” ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Trans Video El- ecs., Ltd., 975 F. Supp. 2d 1083, 1086 (N.D. Cal. 2013). Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, without prejudice to defendant renewing, after discovery, the argument that plaintiff lacks Article III standing. The Court will con- tinue to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and overtules defendant’s objections to Marilyn Robles’s declaration. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 9, 2022 Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garcia v. 12th & 13th Webster Street, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-12th-13th-webster-street-llc-cand-2022.