Garcia v. 100 Church Fee Owner LLC
Opinion
Garcia v 100 Church Fee Owner LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 30716(U) March 4, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158554/2018 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 158554/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 201 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2025
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice ---------------- -------X INDEX NO. 158554/2018 GEREMIAS J. BERGANZA GARCIA, MOTION DATE 04/18/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 005 - V -
100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC,100 CHURCH STREET TENANT, LLC,SL GREEN REAL TY CORP., R & S DECISION + ORDER ON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING, INC.,STEPHEN FOY MECHANICAL SERVICE CORP., MOTION
Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------X
100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC, SL GREEN REALTY Third-Party CORP., R & S CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTING, INC. Index No. 595447/2019
Plaintiff,
-against-
MELLIFONT CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180,181,182, 183,184,185,186, 187,188,189, 195,196,197,198, 199 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT-SUMMARY
Upon the foregoing documents, and after a final submission date of January 13, 2025,
Third-Party Defendants Mellifont Construction Corp. 's ("Mellifont") motion seeking summary
judgment dismissing Third-Party Plaintiffs 100 Church Fee Owner LLC, SL Green Realty Corp.,
and R&S Construction Contracting, Inc.' s (collectively "Third-Party Plaintiffs") third-party claims
is denied. 1
1 Although Mellifont states in its notice of motion it seeks summary judgment on its claims, a reading of the motion papers makes clear Mellifont is seeking dismissal of Third-Party Plaintiffs' claims. 158554/2018 BERGANZA GARCIA, GEREMIAS J. vs.100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 005
1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 158554/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 201 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2025
L Background
Mellifont employed Plaintiff Geremias J. Berganza Garcia ("Plaintiff') to perform
demolition work at 100 Church Street, New York, New York ("the "Worksite"). On June 23, 2018,
Plaintiff was injured when a metal object fell down an elevator shaft and struck him. Plaintiff then
filed this lawsuit seeking damages arising from alleged violations of the New York Labor Law.
In its Decision and Order dated June 28, 2024, on motion sequence 003, the Court granted
Plaintiff summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim asserted against Third-Party
Plaintiffs. The Court denied Third-Party Plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment on their
third party and crossclaims seeking common law indemnity, contractual indemnification, and
breach of contract for failure to procure insurance. In this motion, Mellifont seeks summary
judgment dismissing Third-Party Plaintiffs' common law indemnity, contractual indemnity, and
breach of contract claims.
II. Discussion
A. Standard
"Summary judgment is a drastic remedy, to be granted only where the moving party has
tendered sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact." (Vega v
Restani Const. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]). The moving party's "burden is a heavy one and
on a motion for summary judgment, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-
moving party." (Jacobsen v New York City Health and Hasps. Corp., 22 NY3d 824, 833 [2014]).
Once this showing is made, the burden shifts to the party opposing the motion to produce
evidentiary proof, in admissible form, sufficient to establish the existence of material issues of fact
which require a trial (See e.g., Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557,562 [1980]).
158554/2018 BERGANZA GARCIA, GEREMIAS J. vs. 100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 005
2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 158554/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 201 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2025
B. Common Law Indemnification and Breach of Contract
As a preliminary matter, Mellifont's motion papers do not set forth any arguments for
dismissal of these claims. The failure to set forth any evidence or arguments in favor of dismissing
these claims precludes the Court from granting Mellifont summary judgment dismissing Third-
Party Plaintiffs common law indemnification and breach of contract claims. Therefore, this portion
of Mellifont's motion for summary judgment is denied.
C. Contractual Indemnification
Mellifont's motion to dismiss Third-Party Plaintiffs' contractual indemnification claim is
denied. As this Court stated in its Decision and Order on motion sequence 003, there is a triable
issue of fact as to whether Third-Party Defendants were actively negligent in supervising
adequately the various trades. Further, the indemnification clause relied upon by Third-Party
Plaintiffs is not unenforceable because it contains savings language requiring indemnification only
"to the fullest extent permitted by law" (see, e.g. Guzman v 170 West End Ave. Associates, 115
AD3d 462, 463-464 [1st Dept 2014]). The Court has considered Mellifont's argument that the
indemnification clause is unenforceable because it is not "clear and unambiguous" and finds it to
be without merit. Indeed, there is evidence that Mellifont is already partially indemnifying Third-
Party Plaintiffs as Mellifont's general liability insurer is providing a defense to Third-Party
Plaintiffs. Therefore, Mellifont's motion is denied in its entirety.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that Third-Party Defendants Mellifont Construction Corp.'s motion seeking
summary judgment dismissing Third-Party Plaintiffs 100 Church Fee Owner LLC, SL Green
Realty Corp., and R&S Construction Contracting, Inc. 's third-party claims asserted is denied; and
it is further
158554/2018 BERGANZA GARCIA, GEREMIAS J. vs. 100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 005
3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 158554/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 201 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2025
ORDERED that within ten days of entry, counsel for Third-Party Plaintiffs shall serve a
copy of this Decision and Order, with notice of entry, on all parties via NYSCEF.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
3/4/2025 DATE HON~ ARY V. ROSADO, J.S.C. CHECK ONE : CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED 0 DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE : INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
158554/2018 BERGANZA GARCIA , GEREMIAS J. vs. 100 CHURCH FEE OWNER LLC Page 4 of 4 Motion No. 005
4 of 4 [* 4]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 NY Slip Op 30716(U) (Garcia v. 100 Church Fee Owner LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.