Garcia Trujillo v. Tony Avis Hay Service

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || JAIME GARCIA TRUJILLO, No. 2:21-cv-1446-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 73.) 14 || TONY AVIS HAY SERVICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 M7 The court has reviewed the parties’ amended stipulated protective order. (See ECF No. 73.) The 18 stipulation comports with the relevant authorities and the court’s applicable local rule. See L.R. 141.1. 19 |! The court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. Once an action is 20 || closed, “the court will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed 21 that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see also, e.g., MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 92 Cal., Feb. 03, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for 3 || disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the court will not retain 4 jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. 95 Dated: August 25, 2023

26 Fesil Arn SD, truj.1446 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE