Garcia, Rodolfo Alvarado

Opinion

1\".\

. ` 4 q ‘ v v )/~l .SU'?\‘€me C_ou€'\: 31.1`1\<1\\'\_?>' §j‘q%§r_ 20\ \UC§>{: \"\’c*\ § ‘\:re@£ Q\oo'm lC>CQ, lA>)s+T>v\,'c'v/;YZYO[ '

Ro §O\ %O G\O~‘”C_\_C\ 7 b 3 "li 3 x § This dogument contains single 31 es‘that are of‘po`or qua i ' § \"H \ 0 O\K § \jt\'u\l 20 3 q 5 gt tghe time 01 imaging. . ' CQUS€ 112 156

;O€‘c 509me .TA“l‘i`lB§ 5 _ ` T\~\\S as A\\\ §‘»mv\z\©&mm_ég;_mm-r \\/\OT\ON T@ \111_@\1'”'~”1 A Co\\s\x\m'.m\\!

NOW Covme§ 11010&0% QQAO\€+C>‘ @L

“DeEQvuc>\cmX wm C.ov\\)¥c»¢cd.®\?€ A»S%v@v'u‘ctd Assu': 1111 Comm`€+_£e&- flech r<)&.w$s"\;o Cc)w”£‘s docum_em%§ 00 1`:511': 151-010‘1 011 S€P.{”c:mb€'r',~ I‘NZ' \V\ P

“ . :fv\ OPczvi 600¢4: an ch» 111 l°l‘llo ole@ewcl\vn‘c @\m~c¥€\ CVu{:ea"c:cLO\ PLCG\ O€ 31)1"11;`1 “1:¢;> `1;1/\8 C_\/mrgc: w?'{:LL/Ou'f_ UchSlEF§*ch/Lcl `1:\'\13 C<;)vm§€'.°\ucv\c_es o 6 '(;L\z: Pla& drg;€,w\m\{ 131€& 3011`1;`1 01'\1`[ 1'<)€'15<‘: “~0101/\ 1155 GJC&Q¢”V\€`) 5 GLc)\_\/E"CC»

T\/\e Be eem<‘wt 13 not 301111 011 ch$€ 2151}>5111(1 D€¥~'€hc_lpoa‘t V\cv"<~?$` €,@mvm" H:Cc\ '-l"_`)/\C G*'“cl/Y\€ `Dz:€~€/zcla¢/l{' C

110 COV! §C’C/U‘{?i’\/G `11:0_11¢'5 614 600$<‘: 115(9

D€G€v)cl&\/\X, V`L€\fer howe bean 1a Pr;;$@n loz~_>€<)rv~ 111/155 15 U’\F~'> 103 €S"\: thLC 151/wit cl§:€evz0101'/1{' iQl€¢ QQrclc\

\5 Ser\/u/\SS 131/113 1v\ £v\f, 101<05 O€chtmu/oi~c)SCnm\ REQENEMN L »

’1°1\ 1§§111§;‘ COURT OF CR|M|NA|_ AppEALS n ‘ ' ,- COURT OF CR|M|NA1. APPEAl ' 1101/23 1‘ 153

DEc 10 2115 - 113

Abe| Acosta, C|erk ADQACOST&,CEBFK

y ll@m,j\;i/\§: 5“¢”\ dod QY:S::/>'+¢mloer,zo@z,; dgg;€,,,c£ant §`\’\.c<)~ a ma&i°-on {-`or ?€¢>clucjc¥ovl 66 G`<)kef?z§f'ri` ;DNA zvr»clemfi wu).‘c\/\c Cm)r~"c mdc-hhc E<)(L@L.».JEMS éz».c+$ §§m.d;m§$°;

\- \§o §or€v~é$fé, ©NA év‘§ck€nc£ Cur'rE/)%,l“/ sa<,Z?-$“l*. Q:‘T('\€ exum?m\:‘éc>v\ £>€~`~&;91€ OVE‘D’QLQ\ ®urjc’$i`o?

©,€ (:W‘: Pro$€ edf _ , 4 SU<;M_ 504/cans F’C_ DN‘A zv?)deh_@e ever cx\’g~&&

13 _ T\nc l&€m L~z t‘i 0 ii £C\é'de\»C,'C`)< 6,_1_<1:\£:_§-5_3 ~’ _

. '\”\n€ 5\.3¢»1’0`\€ goade C)£i/»`Z}Ccl m%, PQFQ\E @pn,"Z.»-

_ (BEQC\`\JSE H/»€ ¥`CC@ rc§‘»~§ 53 QQ..¢‘\FM'WS fe {:9\¢ :B<>qc?c)\ 4,€0>16-\ F§ro\c$ `lvw ~ §c¢>s\:€§ USC’. 09 a wv::o,ll’>ov\.- AM an Augus-'f P2) 2011

)€;\~:_@oo.»r<§ @€ 9@&>\¢:5 U$c'~l;(q€ 'S<;»m£? Pre~[+ezc‘[‘ Zc) cle¢Q»V_/_?°V '

1 \>c\,m\€~ T'\\G usc cfc 01 weapon 413 Q.SCPM "lei 01%>'75/1@,'.” f

. rcawdawc~f §£Q.£PMS am 0'/,~<§¢:@1‘1 )m_owm _Fac%'f/@@/* was 1 Coc/L.C¢‘?c@€m:o@. at {;{_ZWQI éZ/'z'.al‘§z/MMQ/%:)g¢ 7106 C_OU°'+§ W@?B hal `(:L\c;§c: ©p£r°’onsl be €'evc mhdczz‘r`%$ fhc fc?d/Tr@d x

C¢mé’/u//L£ @F ~é.z-//)/zz: fmi/ezech 740 é@ fe rvcd 116 mdé`mi fw- "\3\€0\5€ C\,~.,@Q}< W Comc¢m‘rmgl W'cq.(>¢m._; , _ .

Av»c)¢ 'w\_c&?dcw\tnt 'C@»vs@# ;l),§é> _T_A 14@\/@~,`» @m,…»fg¢c)l_ v _U\.`€'s Cr?me ama I’m Ci@m§ 40 weems um\)st'l‘z., P\€_>C`_S@ _C\/\€C\`< € va\\i`b"€"t # (3 )-° _ _. 7 _ _ _

. I \?\5>~\1€ \>_€CV$ C>»(€O~S \"\DSCC§ w‘C"`;\/\ C._c)'lol/\ Cc;mc;r) c_md ' I`m' o_\ c@c\\o'et`§<;. ~E@»¢ 20 \L¢Qrs. /3,¢1 d¢@,,,:d,,,/,§ 15 {L`\¢‘ `- BOCUL op QCM’¢LCV\S 011/rd (')ow-"`»@3§}/1 L@(H:C 09 03““;2/7"/ *‘/) find/777 //Zg >(~[~ pa,{~¢_~,[§ @/,?g,eé;/`,°ff

CLD\“EC: 15 an 03'*.17` 263'~)` ? '_P\C’O‘SL> C\AC'Q\<'

€v§\a:"_\¢>&“-b(‘~\ )¢. , , . .

9~03

L;L>

\.U\'\e,f€€`-Or€; @r€ m“€‘$€§' Coms.‘»’s'elerco? , >"i'l'/Lc D€g@»¢g¢},h¢)$ N\@e‘c@v» G¢r~-.\s>el.€>e§<.. » , ,

l Qc$ P cci~FU//v Své»/)i/‘££c

I¢>~ 753¢//3 w Qé”a/LWS Pro--S<~ L'E\ZT\{~'{CATE QF SER\)\QE

' ':\: here 301 &cr»`ez:;~r é&@\% on n/@\/'. _/g, 9_@1,.§ =I,;LL@\/@ Je\we:rcd 01 Cc)P‘1 ca€'~»+;(/\c above and Fo@¢e gong lvz$£jmmcn*r L`l cl€Pc$e°(:Fl/_l§ Scm/)c;’ ila a POS'E- Pa,§®c Ul/ld,er fine Carc: wm Qus’~{édv oF 7-%`;> c/z/LP%€J l §bcd:€$ \>c>$+af ge rjv»°ccg and re ;>_/"1 , rc%uc’$~£ed Fr'om -(;ke‘Sc/P 'K’CW`LE? CGU('~E l?>uDl.dBI/LZ» ' _ '

Vu'r$oaw& £<» '(:H;\E 2%"- U¢S¢C» § 1746 amf jé${-[c: 4 e)£'»{/z€ T`€ Ka$ CZ‘»\/§i 'Prac+Ucc|:'$ Q/»'L.d Ze/m?d£c§ Cc>dc; (`//L`Q />2"€"` /52)» “I:\/x€ pof'la>wBI/!._Q> b€cl&m.{:¢\,’cm L'>€BME> U_V\chm 15 @Oco.¢'?,,C/D`-£d U\/~La)¢€r' S»{;OFEC and -Fed_emf /;aa/'»

1 'Q-@$p@¢.,¢m/Y Sz/z>mmcd,- '_ jo,_`?¢,g#//g_g@c@m 971/m Mamio§ /)m*$<° * LH;. was 3.,\+@1 .:L@ 3*1~ ' . .E"¢_c.~l: S%¢Q¢'<+m.- 'Té)

l

'-2`/

RoDoLFo'ALVARADo GARCIA

_~ Bonn $ _ZZ} ,~zz)‘§z z hcaUsE NUMBE§ ;¢§§/Q§}§.' ;}5" THE sTATE oF TExAsl )( IN THE DIsTRIcT coURT oF vs;a . "` ' ~~ ~' §§ PEcos coUNTY,WTExA$

§§ §ZELEKJUDICIAL DISTRicT

INDICTMENT

"DEFENDANT: RoDoLFo ALVARADQ GARcIA

DATE OF BIRTH: JULY 9, 1955

AFELONY CHARGE: AGGRAVATED " ' ? ASSAULT

IN THE NAME_AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

The duly organized Grand Jury of Pecos County, Texas presents in the District Court of Pecos County, Texas, that in Pecos County, Texas,'RODOLFO ALVARADO GARCIA; 'hereafter styled the Defendant, heretofore on or about September l, 1993, the exact date unknown by.the Grand Jury but prior to the presentment of this indictment, did then and there intentionally and knowing¥ lyl cause the sexual organ of the Defendant to penetrate the mouth of J, U., a child younger than 14 years of age and not the spouse of the Defendant,' - '

AGAINST THE PEACE AND DIGNITY OF THE STATE.

cpsa/peer

PRESIDING JURoR

JUL 1 8 1994

JAN|CE 570 _ C|'!.€Q:_E’ ~ -

;vv‘o»v ’.’:

cAUSE No. 2156 `L|O\L f!._`¢. 1996 THE sTATE oF TEXAS' §' 646 ' " :DQ£ /7 . _ § _ ._ w 7 /z;L./?i vs. § _IN THE DISTRIcT-coURT oF ' , ‘ ¢-` § PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS RODOLFO ALVARADO GARCIA §

JUDGMENT oN PLEA oF GUILTY BEFORE CoURT`w_AIVER o`F 'JURY TRIAL;

Judge Presiding: ALEX QQNZALEZ . Date of Judgment: 11- 12~ 96 .Attorney - Attorney

_For State: ALBERT G. VALADEZ For Defendant: EDWARD T. GARZA Offense

Convicted of: AGGRAVATED.Dftvzf=ASSAULT

Penal Code Section Violated: 22.021 ' Date Offense

Degree: lST , Committed: SEPTEMBER 1l 1993 Charging _

Instrument: Ingictment Plea: guil ty

Terms of `1

Plea Bargain (in detail): 40 years TDCJ, ID to run consecutive to

Cause No. 2154 and §12. 45 the , 1 ' with a child committed on or about September 12, 11996; $169. 50 court cost

Plea to Enhancement Findings on

Paragraph(s): QZA Enhancement: HLA

Findin on Use ` ~ , Deadl Weapon`: N[A ' Findings that or alcoho},/9 significantly contributed to the

commission of the offense. Driver' s Licens%

Suspended: ' ' Open Container: AAé

» Date Sentence

Imposed: /://CZ“?¢ - Costs: 169,§9 Punishment and Place of Confinement: TDCJ, ID §HJVHHS Date to Commence: //~' /=7~"? 6

Total Amount of ' 4 Time Credited: QS§ 441/5 Restitution: )@/ Concurrent ` Unless Otherwis`e Specified: COnS@CLULn/@ ’f© @aLl$€ /1/0-»?/54/

` `_Jmmmr_

ON THIS the 12TH day of NOVEMBER,1996, the above entitled and numbered cause was called for trial. Then came the State of Texas, by and through her District Attorney/Assistant DiStrict Attorney for the 83RD Judicial District, and the Defendant,

'RODOLFO ALVARADO GAR IA A,“mwhbm"ap eared in person and by his attorney of record, UARD ..... “T§E§ ZA.. The District Attorney

in erson and in

announced ready for tria® eng thé)Defendant, by and through his-

attorney, after also announc1 re_ '¢*

z for trial,

DEFE`NDANT’s ~ ElealT'

!>`-;PL

/’/,6 "'-'.;\

"'Hnnm\\\\“

83RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

l ~' €.LW`\O_W ®

IN THE 83RD DlSTRlCT COURT ' OF PECOS COUNTY, TEXAS

`THE sTATE oF TEXAS

V.

RoDoLFo A GARCIA ev `.'

ORDE

On the 5"‘ day of September, 2002, came on to be considered the motion of movant for production of forensic DNA evidence, and appearing before the Court was Frank Lacy as Assistant District Attorney for Pecos County, Texas, and Martin O. Adams, as court appointed counsel for movant The Court then proceeded to receive into evidence the exhibits offered and heard the argument of counsel; and having duly considered the same, the Court makes the following fact findings:

- l. ` That no forensic DNA evidence currently exists; and, 2. That an examination of the otiicialcourt’s record and of the records of the jprosecuting attorney reveal that no such forensic DNA evidence ever existed so far as is known to the State and to the Court; and 3. 5 - That the trial record reveals that the"ide`ntity of the defendant was never at issue.

Therefore, the Court having duly considered the foregoing, the motion by defendant for forensic DNA testing be and is hereby denied.

signedth [Fday qfoccober, 2002.

_sz];a£lis_~

Carl Pendergi‘ass, Dist® Judge

l ( Arnchon cr coPY\DG%HEREBY . ~' ‘ " stan 75§,__\>/\6 ___..._. » 1 'DATE );? ,

sTAT_E_ oF TExAs BoARD oF PARDoNs AND PARoLEs -

Fe_bruary ‘05, 2015

l\/lr. Rodolfo Garcia )K

TDCJ- ClD/S|D # 768418

Lynaugh Unit

1098 South Highway 2037 ;'_Fort Stockton Texas 79735

Dear lVlr. (_Barcia:

The information you provided will be forwarded for placement in your permanent file to be available for consideration by the Parole Panel at the appropriate time. The case is not in review at this time.

` information you wish to present may be addressed to Texas Department of Criminal Justioe- Parole Division Attn: Correspondence, P. O Box 13401 Caplto| Station Austin, T_exas 78711

'According to our records you were received in TDCJ- C|D in 1996 and have not been out of custody

. s1nce that time. On January 1st, 2015 you were granted parole on cause # 2154. Your time for cause # 2156 was backdated to a sentence begin date of 03-27-14. Your next parole eligibility date is 03- 27- 34

C.Owen , . ` 1 Amarillo,lPO ' ' ‘

Amarillo institutional Parole Office ~ 5809 S, Western ~ Ste. 130 ~ Amarlllo, TX - 79110 Offender Status Line (844) 512~0461 ~ T (806) 352-9500 ~ F (806) 467-1348

/` .