Garcia-Rocio v. Washburn

510 P.3d 292, 319 Or. App. 694
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 18, 2022
DocketA175452
StatusPublished

This text of 510 P.3d 292 (Garcia-Rocio v. Washburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia-Rocio v. Washburn, 510 P.3d 292, 319 Or. App. 694 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted April 19, affirmed May 18, 2022

CRESENCIO GARCIA-ROCIO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Sue WASHBURN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Defendant-Respondent. Umatilla County Circuit Court 18CV58898; A175452 510 P3d 292

J. Burdette Pratt, Senior Judge. Jedediah Peterson and O’Connor Weber LLC filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Rebecca M. Auten, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and Mooney, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Smith v. Kelly, 318 Or App 567, 508 P3d 77 (2022).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Kelly
508 P.3d 77 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 P.3d 292, 319 Or. App. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-rocio-v-washburn-orctapp-2022.