Garcia, Pedro

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 29, 2010
DocketWR-65,013-03
StatusPublished

This text of Garcia, Pedro (Garcia, Pedro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia, Pedro, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-65,013-02 AND WR-65,013-03

EX PARTE PEDRO GARCIA, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1996CR3466 IN THE 399TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated assault and sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Garcia v. State, No. 04-02-00476-CR (Tex. App. - San Antonio, October 29, 2003).

On July 26, 1006, this Court denied Applicant's first habeas application, in which he alleged that he was denied the opportunity to petition this Court for discretionary review. Applicant filed a second habeas application, which this Court dismissed as a subsequent application on March 11, 2009. The dismissal of Applicant's second application was erroneous, as Applicant's first application did not challenge the merits of his conviction. See Ex parte McPherson, 32 S.W.3d 860 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). On September 2, 2010, this Court received Applicant's third application, which raises a single ground for review. Because Applicant's second application was erroneously dismissed, this Court has reconsidered the second application on its own motion, and has determined that Applicant's grounds for review are without merit and should be denied. In addition, this Court has reviewed Applicant's third application, and determined that his ground for review in that application is also without merit. Therefore, we deny relief on both applications.



Filed: September 29, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte McPherson
32 S.W.3d 860 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garcia, Pedro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-pedro-texcrimapp-2010.