Garcia, Moises Jr.

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 10, 2008
DocketWR-68,666-02
StatusPublished

This text of Garcia, Moises Jr. (Garcia, Moises Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia, Moises Jr., (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-68,666-02
EX PARTE MOISES GARCIA, JR., Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 36254-171 IN THE 171ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM EL PASO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated rape and sentenced to fifty-five years' imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Moises v. State, No. 08-84-00119-CR (Tex. App.-El Paso, Feb. 6, 1985, no pet.).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied due process at his mandatory supervision revocation hearing. On September 14, 2007, the trial court entered an order designating issues, but no findings of fact and conclusions of law were forwarded with this application. We believe that this application was prematurely forwarded to this Court.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was denied due process at his mandatory supervision revocation hearing. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: December 10, 2008

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garcia, Moises Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-moises-jr-texcrimapp-2008.