Garcia, Martin Hernandez
This text of Garcia, Martin Hernandez (Garcia, Martin Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,442-01
EX PARTE MARTIN HERNANDEZ GARCIA, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR45195A IN THE 385TH DISTRICT COURT FROM MIDLAND COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of possession of a prohibited substance or item in a correctional
facility and sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas
corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that he was denied adequate notice from the Board of Pardons and
Paroles that he would be considered for release on discretionary mandatory supervision. See TEX .
GOV ’T CODE §§ 508.147, 508.149. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to
relief. Ex parte Retzlaff, 135 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should
be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. 2
art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the
General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing
the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects
to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the
hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court
shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant
was provided adequate notice from the Board of Pardons and Paroles that he would be considered
for release on discretionary mandatory supervision. The trial court may make any other findings and
conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Garcia, Martin Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-martin-hernandez-texcrimapp-2020.