Garcia Lopez v. Holder
This text of 362 F. App'x 804 (Garcia Lopez v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jesus Alberto Garcia Lopez and Martha Maria Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s March 8, 2007, order dismissing petitioners’ appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying their application for cancellation of removal. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).
The petition for review is timely only as to the BIA’s May 11, 2007, order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen and reconsider. In their brief, petitioners fail to address this order and waive any challenge to it. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid *806 ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F. App'x 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-lopez-v-holder-ca9-2010.