Garcia-Herrera v. Gonzales
This text of 168 F. App'x 762 (Garcia-Herrera v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Lydia Janeth Garcia-Herrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Barroso v. Gonzales, 429 F.3d 1195, 1200 (9th Cir.2005), and we grant the petition for review.
Garcia-Herrera filed a timely motion to reopen within her voluntary departure period. The BIA denied the motion to reopen solely on the ground that Garcia-Herrera failed to depart within her voluntary departure period. This court recently held that a timely-filed motion to reopen automatically tolls the voluntary departure period. See id. at 1205. Accordingly, we [763]*763grant the petition for review and remand for the BIA to consider the merits of Garcia-Herrera’s motion to reopen. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 F. App'x 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-herrera-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.