Garcia (Adam) Vs. State

472 P.3d 190
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 18, 2020·No. 80183·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ADAM RALPH GARCIA, No. 80183 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. SEP 1 8 2020 ELiZker:e fru BROWN CLERK O PREME COURT BY

EPU CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to correct a clerical error. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Nathan Tod Young, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to correct a clerical error, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

, J. J.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Nathan Tod Young, District Judge Adarn Ralph Garcia Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden Douglas County Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcia (Adam) Vs. State, 472 P.3d 190 (Neb. 2020).

472 P.3d 190 (Garcia (Adam) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)