Garcia (Adam) Vs. State
This text of 472 P.3d 190 (Garcia (Adam) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ADAM RALPH GARCIA, No. 80183 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. SEP 1 8 2020 ELiZker:e fru BROWN CLERK O PREME COURT BY EPU CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to correct a clerical error. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Nathan Tod Young, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion to correct a clerical error, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
, J. J. Hardesty
cc: Hon. Nathan Tod Young, District Judge Adarn Ralph Garcia Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden Douglas County Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 P.3d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-adam-vs-state-nev-2020.