Garcea v. Battista

53 A.D.3d 1071, 859 N.Y.S.2d 876
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Garcea v. Battista. Read the opinion of the Court — 53 A.D.3d 1068
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 2008·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Harold L. Galloway, J.), entered December 14, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order denied that part of the motion of defendants Mark D. Rivoli, Michael B. Rivoli, and The Gates Pub, Inc. seeking, inter alia, leave to renew their prior motion to vacate an order of default judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Garcea v Battista (53 AD3d 1068 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garcea v. Battista, 53 A.D.3d 1071, 859 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

53 A.D.3d 1071 (Garcea v. Battista) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garcea v. Battista
53 A.D.3d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)