Garbett v. Mountford

57 A. 257, 70 N.J.L. 577, 41 Vroom 577, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 23, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A. 257 (Garbett v. Mountford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garbett v. Mountford, 57 A. 257, 70 N.J.L. 577, 41 Vroom 577, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194 (N.J. 1904).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

Counsel have argued by briefs a motion to vacate a rule issued by a justice of this court in vacation discharging a rule to show cause why a writ of attachment issued out of this court should not be quashed.

[578]*578The motion is improper and brings nothing before ús. Either the proceeding before the single justice was nugatory, in which ease the rule to show cause has not been disposed of, or else the justice heard the rule by consent, sitting for this branch of the Supreme Court, in which case his decision is not subject to review. The matter is not one of those that can be reviewed as a motion made before a single justice, as was the case in Key v. Paul, 32 Vroom 133.

The motion is denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosencrans v. Township of Eatontown
77 A. 88 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A. 257, 70 N.J.L. 577, 41 Vroom 577, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garbett-v-mountford-nj-1904.