Garber v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Garber v. Fisher

275 P. 159, 127 Kan. 764, 1929 Kan. LEXIS 209

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedMarch 9, 1929

DocketNo. 28,481

StatusPublished

This text of 275 P. 159 (Garber v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garber v. Fisher, 275 P. 159, 127 Kan. 764, 1929 Kan. LEXIS 209 (kan 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Garber was arrested on a warrant charging him with arson.. At the preliminary examination the examining magistrate found the crime had been committed, and there was probable cause to believe Garber was guilty. Garber commenced an action of [765]*765habeas corpus in the district court to procure his discharge from custody, his contention being that the evidence was not sufficient to justify the examining magistrate in holding him for trial. The district court remanded petitioner to the custody of the sheriff, and he appeals.

It would serve no useful purpose to spread the evidence introduced at the preliminary examination on the pages of the Kansas reports. The evidence justified a finding that the crime of arson had been committed, and that there was strong probability the petitioner was guilty.

The appeal is dismissed for want of merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Garber was arrested on a warrant charging him with arson.. At the preliminary examination the examining magistrate found the crime had been committed, and there was probable cause to believe Garber was guilty. Garber commenced an action of [765]*765habeas corpus in the district court to procure his discharge from custody, his contention being that the evidence was not sufficient to justify the examining magistrate in holding him for trial. The district court remanded petitioner to the custody of the sheriff, and he appeals.

It would serve no useful purpose to spread the evidence introduced at the preliminary examination on the pages of the Kansas reports. The evidence justified a finding that the crime of arson had been committed, and that there was strong probability the petitioner was guilty.

The appeal is dismissed for want of merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 P. 159, 127 Kan. 764, 1929 Kan. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garber-v-fisher-kan-1929.