Garben v. McKittrick
225 A.D. 772
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s motion to strike out the first separate defense contained in the reply to the counterclaim in defendant’s amended answer reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion .denied, with ten dollars costs. The Statute of Limitations was properly pleaded as a defense to the counterclaim, which attempts to set forth a cause of action for malpractice. (Fish v. Conley, 221 App. Div. 609; Black v. Van Aiken, 224 id. 759.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garben v. McKittrick, 225 A.D. 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
225 A.D. 772 (Garben v. McKittrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between SCM Corp. & Fisher Park Lane Co.
358 N.E.2d 1024 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Hammill v. Curtis
18 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
City of New York v. Alpha Contracting Corp.
182 Misc. 115 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Kosolapov v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
144 Misc. 499 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)