Garb v. Garb, No. Fa91 0116197 S (Apr. 23, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5014
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 23, 1998
DocketNo. FA91 0116197 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5014 (Garb v. Garb, No. Fa91 0116197 S (Apr. 23, 1998)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garb v. Garb, No. Fa91 0116197 S (Apr. 23, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5014 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF FEES AND COSTS (#185) The parties' agreement disposing of the pending motions (#175) and (#180.50) also included motion (#181) filed by the minor's attorney.

The agreement's provisions did not dispose of the unpaid fees due the minor's attorney of $13,901.85 as itemized on the bill attached to motion (#185).

The court is aware that the services of the minor's attorney were needed, the billing rate is reasonable and he deserves to be paid. However, only $2,500.00 has been paid by the plaintiff. Unfortunately, the parties are of modest means. The defendant is not employed.

The court finds that the minor's attorney must submit the unpaid portion of the bill to the State of Connecticut.

The court orders the plaintiff to pay an additional $2,500.00 to the minor's counsel in monthly installments of $100.00 commencing June 1, 1998.

The court orders the defendant to pay $1,000.00 to the minor's attorney in monthly installments of $75.00 commencing June 1, 1998. CT Page 5015

So Ordered.

HARRIGAN, J.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (#162)

HARRIGAN, JUDGE.

The defendant has moved for an award of attorney' s fees for matters previously disposed by stipulation (#187).

There is nothing pending between the parties.

Section 46b-62 contemplates a matter before the court needing resolution. The defendant' s request is untimely. Dobozy v.Dobozy, 241 Conn. 490, 497 (1997).

The defendant's motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dobozy v. Dobozy
697 A.2d 1117 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 5014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garb-v-garb-no-fa91-0116197-s-apr-23-1998-connsuperct-1998.