Garay v. Karborany

789 So. 2d 526, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9782, 2001 WL 802125
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 18, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-728
StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 526 (Garay v. Karborany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garay v. Karborany, 789 So. 2d 526, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9782, 2001 WL 802125 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Richards v. Mindlin, 94 Fla. 699, 114 So. 508 (1927); Bailey v. First Mortgage Corp. of Boca Raton, 478 So.2d 502, 503 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(citing Annotation, Marketable Title, 57 A.L.R. 1253, 1322-24 (1928), observing “[A] mortgage standing undischarged of record against land sold by executory contract constitutes a defect in the vendor’s title.... ”); Blackmon v. Hill, 427 So.2d 228, 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackmon v. Hill
427 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Bailey v. First Mortg. Corp. of Boca Raton
478 So. 2d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Richards v. Mindlin
114 So. 508 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
789 So. 2d 526, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9782, 2001 WL 802125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garay-v-karborany-fladistctapp-2001.