Garan v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedSeptember 19, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-06978
StatusUnknown

This text of Garan v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital (Garan v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garan v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOZEF GARAN, Plaintiff, 24-CV-6978 (AS) -against- NOTICE OF INITIAL NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Defendant.

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN, United States District Judge: Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on December 10, 2024 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 15A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. Any party that is proceeding in this case pro se is also required to appear at this conference. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. All parties must familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Practices, including the Court’s Individual Practices for Pro Se Litigants, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-arun-subramanian. Counsel must register promptly as filing users on ECF. Counsel and the pro se litigant are directed to confer with each other prior to the conference regarding settlement and each of the other subjects to be considered at a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 conference. Additionally, in accordance with Paragraph 2.D of the Court’s Individual Practices, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, as well as a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter, no later than seven calendar days before the conference date. The parties shall use this Court’s form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-arun-subramanian. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference. The joint letter shall not exceed three (3) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs: (1) A brief statement of the nature of the action and the principal defenses, and the major legal and factual issues that are most important to resolving the case, whether by trial, settlement or dispositive motion; (2) A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. In any action in which subject matter jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1332, the letter must explain the basis for the parties’ belief that diversity of citizenship exists. Where any party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation and the principal place of business. In cases where any party is a partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or trust, the letter shall state the citizenship of each of the entity’s members, shareholders, partners, and/or trustees. See, e.g., Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2000). If this information is lengthy, it may be included in an Appendix to the letter, not to be included in the page limit. (3) A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates, and/or cut-off dates; (4) A brief description of any outstanding motions; (5) A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place and of any discovery that is necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations; (6) A brief description of the status of prior settlement discussions, without disclosing exact offers and demands; (7) A statement confirming that the parties have discussed the use of alternate dispute resolution mechanisms and indicating whether the parties believe that (a) a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge; (b) participation in the District’s Mediation Program; and/or (c) retention of a privately retained mediator would be appropriate and, if so, when in the case (e.g., within the next sixty days; after the deposition of plaintiff is completed; after the close of fact discovery; etc.) the use of such a mechanism would be appropriate; and (8) Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case. Pursuant to the Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Pro Se Cases, a copy of which is attached to this Order, all communications with the Court by a pro se party — including the aforementioned letter — should be mailed to the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl St., New York, NY 10007, ATTN: Pro Se Intake Unit. No documents or court filings should be sent directly to Chambers. Copies of correspondence between a pro se party and counsel shall not be sent to the Court. Pro se parties should take note that there is a Pro Se Law Clinic in this District which is designed to assist non-incarcerated people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic may be able to provide Plaintiff(s) with advice in connection with this case. The Pro Se Law Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group; it is not part of, or run by, the Court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any unrepresented party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). The Clinic is located in the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York, in Room LL22. The Clinic is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., except on days when the Court is closed. An unrepresented party can make an appointment in person, by calling (212) 659-6190, or online (https://nylag.org/pro-se-clinic/). If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel and any pro se party are not required to submit such a letter or to appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination is filed on the docket prior to the date of the conference, using the appropriate ECF Filing Event. See SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions §§ 13.17-13.19 & App’x A, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel are not required to submit such a letter or to appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination is filed on the docket prior to the date of the conference, using the appropriate ECF Filing Event. See SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions §§ 13.17-13.19 & App’x A, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing. In accordance with the Court’s Individual Practices, requests for an extension or adjournment may be made only by letter-motion filed on ECF and must be received at least 48 hours before the deadline or conference. The written submission must state (1) the original date(s); (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension; (3) whether these previous requests were granted or denied; (4) whether the adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for refusing to consent; and (5) the date of the parties’ next scheduled appearance before the Court. Unless counsel are notified that the conference has been adjourned, it will be held as scheduled. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court’s Individual Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court’s Individual Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2024 New York, New York

ARUN SUBRAMANIAN United States District Judge

Revised: July 29, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Garan v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garan-v-new-york-presbyterian-hospital-nysd-2024.