Gaoiran v. Hoapili

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 13, 2026
DocketCAAP-24-0000543
StatusPublished

This text of Gaoiran v. Hoapili (Gaoiran v. Hoapili) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gaoiran v. Hoapili, (hawapp 2026).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 13-MAY-2026 07:54 AM Dkt. 37 ODSLJ

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

BASILIA C. GAOIRAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIANNE K. HOAPILI, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL CASE NO. 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth, and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On April 13, 2026, the court entered an Order for Temporary Remand instructing the district court to enter an appealable written order and/or judgment, or provide an explanation as to why it is not possible or appropriate to do so. (2) On April 29, 2026, the district court entered the "Order Re: July 25, 2024 Hearing" that stated Plaintiff-Appellee Basilia C. Gaoiran "was directed to the court's service center to file the writ of possession and judgment for possession" and "[t]o date, Plaintiff has not submitted a writ of possession and/or judgment for possession for entry by the court." The district court also stated "[o]nce jurisdiction is vested in this court, the matter should be dismissed pursuant to Rules 12 and/or 29 of the Rules of the District Courts of the State of Hawai#i." (3) This court lacks jurisdiction over self- represented Defendant-Appellant Dianne K. Hoapili's appeal because the district court has not entered an appealable order or NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

judgment, see Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai#i 115, 869 P.2d 1334 (1994), and it stated it does not intend to do so, cf. Waikiki v. Ho#omaka Village Assoc. of Apartment Owners, 140 Hawai#i 197, 204, 398 P.3d 786, 793 (2017). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 13, 2026.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright
869 P.2d 1334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)
Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village Ass'n of Apartment Owners
398 P.3d 786 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gaoiran v. Hoapili, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaoiran-v-hoapili-hawapp-2026.