Gao v. State
This text of Gao v. State (Gao v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000694 02-SEP-2015 SCWC-14-0000694 10:50 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
GENBAO GAO, Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent/Employer-Appellee, Self-Insured. ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000694; CASE NO. AB 2009-020 (2-08-40165))
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant Genbao Gao’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 17, 2015, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 2, 2015.
Genbao Gao /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Maria C. Cook for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gao v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gao-v-state-haw-2015.