Ganzie v. Ponton

Fourth Circuit

Ganzie v. Ponton

619 F. App'x 260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2015

DocketNo. 15-6853

StatusPublished

This text of 619 F. App'x 260 (Ganzie v. Ponton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ganzie v. Ponton, 619 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Ganzie appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ganzie v. Warden Ponton, No. 2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va., May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Ganzie appeals the district court’s judgment granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil rights complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ganzie v. Warden Ponton, No. 2:14-cv-00350-RBS-DEM (E.D.Va., May 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 F. App'x 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ganzie-v-ponton-ca4-2015.