Ganz v. Virdee, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Ganz v. Virdee, Inc.

400 P.2d 862, 1 Ariz. App. 191

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona

DecidedApril 15, 1965

DocketNo. 1 CA-CIV 2

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 400 P.2d 862 (Ganz v. Virdee, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ganz v. Virdee, Inc., 400 P.2d 862, 1 Ariz. App. 191 (Ark. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The issues in this case arise out of a writing which the plaintiff-appellant urges is a firm contract of employment. Both of the persons who affixed their signatures to the writing testified as to the conversations which lead up to the writing. In our opinion the writing is ambiguous. There was a conflict in the testimony and the conflict was resolved by the trial court in favor of the defendants. Kingsbery v. Kingsbery, 93 Ariz. 217, 379 P.2d 893 (1963). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CAMERON, J., and JACK D. H. HAYS, Superior Court Judge, concurring.

Note: Judge FRANCIS J. DONOFRIO having requested that he be relieved from consideration of this matter, Judge JACK D. H. HAYS was called to sit in h'is stead and participate in the determination of this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The issues in this case arise out of a writing which the plaintiff-appellant urges is a firm contract of employment. Both of the persons who affixed their signatures to the writing testified as to the conversations which lead up to the writing. In our opinion the writing is ambiguous. There was a conflict in the testimony and the conflict was resolved by the trial court in favor of the defendants. Kingsbery v. Kingsbery, 93 Ariz. 217, 379 P.2d 893 (1963). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CAMERON, J., and JACK D. H. HAYS, Superior Court Judge, concurring.

Note: Judge FRANCIS J. DONOFRIO having requested that he be relieved from consideration of this matter, Judge JACK D. H. HAYS was called to sit in h'is stead and participate in the determination of this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

400 P.2d 862, 1 Ariz. App. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ganz-v-virdee-inc-arizctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack